SIGNAL · AI Visibility Assessment

AI Visibility Diagnosis

Integritas appeared in 0 of 27 queries assessed, recording no citations across any engine, query type, or buyer journey stage.

Appears in 0 of 27 buyer questions. 27 go by without a mention. Absent across all measured engines.

Credo AI appears in 7 of the same questions.

AI Visibility

1/10

Almost absent

Entity Clarity

3/10

Weakly defined

Coverage

0/27

queries with a mention

Diagnostic · Brand Mentioned

What AI says when buyers ask about Integritas by name

Claims worth checking 10 Spotted 10 claims to verify · highest risk: medium

Did AI describe you correctly? 30% Described you accurately in 30% of answers

Did AI back it up? Weak proof Most answers used weak evidence

Where the brand is being read

Perplexity

Minimal

0% 0 of 27

ChatGPT

Minimal

0% 0 of 27

Google AIO

Minimal

0% 0 of 24

Claude

Minimal

0% 0 of 27

Where decisions happen, and who is carrying the brand

Where AI brings you into the conversation, measured on queries that do not name the brand.

	Perplexity	ChatGPT	Google AIO	Claude
Category	0%	0%	0%	0%
Problem	0%	0%	0%	0%
Evaluation	0%	0%	0%	0%
Comparison	0%	0%	0%	0%
Validation	0%	0%	0%	0%

Thinnest at the category stage. Lowest on Perplexity.

Three immediate implications

Missed questions

27

buyer questions where no AI engine cites the brand.

Competitor pressure

+7

questions where Credo AI appears and this brand does not.

Category-stage gap

0%

average engine coverage at the category stage, where buyers begin shaping the vendor shortlist and an initial direction.

Messaging Consistency

Entity Clarity

Category consistency is severely fragmented.

But off-site, the story drifts.

Off-site profiles still carry narrower or older category framing that doesn’t fully match the current story.
Buyer framing is uneven across surfaces: The Homepage explicitly targets enterprise organisations adopting AI and auditors seeking regulatory proof, while the About page targets generic 'users' uploading data for validation with no enterprise or AI-specific framing.
The value proposition reads softer or broader on some verification surfaces than it does on the owned site.

What a snapshot surfaces

01 Buyer-journey visibility Where your brand holds the shortlist, and where it drops closer to a decision.
02 Competitor pressure Which competitors are named when your brand isn’t, and on what framing.
03 Entity framing Where off-site signals describe your brand differently from your own site.

The full report goes further: every brand tracked, every inconsistency weakening your visibility, the high-intent queries you’re missing, and the priority actions and content to fix them.

What the full assessment answers

Of the questions Credo AI is being cited on today, which are actually worth challenging, and which aren’t?
Where in the buyer journey does the gap between Integritas and the leading cited brand narrow enough to close inside a quarter?
A six-to-eight-week publishing plan that shifts citation share: what gets built first, and where does it sit?
How much retrieval strength is slipping through category-stage queries and Integritas’s off-site surfaces today?

Available as a full assessment, with implementation support.

Integritas

Where the brand is being read

Where decisions happen, and who is carrying the brand

Three immediate implications

Top Content Opportunities

Messaging Consistency